Guests may browse all the site, but only registered users can post in the main forums.
Unregistered users may post in the Free Range Talk Forum

Thread Rating:
  • 1 Vote(s) - 5 Average
  • 1
  • 2
  • 3
  • 4
  • 5
Isn't this negligence?
#1
http://start.att.net/news/read/category/...rnewsernor

Isn't it obviously negligent to leave a loaded gun where your young child can find it and use it?
[-] The following 1 user Likes jafs3's post:
  • Agent99
Reply
#2
Yes is it jafs. No excuse! Sad.
"I remember landing under sniper fire." -Hildebeast R. Clinton 
Reply
#3
(12-07-2017, 01:43 PM)jafs3 Wrote: http://start.att.net/news/read/category/...rnewsernor

Isn't it obviously negligent to leave a loaded gun where your young child can find it and use it?

Yes. There really isn't an excuse for this sort of thing. I refuse to believe it's just the price of freedom.
Reply
#4
Me too.

If the negligent people hurt themselves, it would be a bit more ok with me.  But when their negligence hurts others, especially children, it's very not ok.
Reply
#5
well, the House would like to make it easier to carry concealed guns across statelines

https://www.npr.org/sections/thetwo-way/...tate-lines
Its very, very difficult to dispel ignorance if you retain arrogance.
Reply
#6
I would guess the problem is carrying it through states in which it's not legal?

Otherwise, if you just have it in KS, and carry it into a neighboring state where it's legal, I'm not sure there's an issue, is there?
Reply
#7
Gun proliferation mixed with stupid-people proliferation has put every person in this country in danger. 

That child could have killed someone else's child. That has also happened. A person might be playing in their yard and a bullet could come from a bedroom window, where a child has found mommy's loaded gun in the drawer. 

We have all read the stories. Every day a child finds a loaded gun in America. Many times it results in a death. 

And nobody gives a shirt.

Nobody in Kansas insists that there be training prior to buying a gun. How else will a stupid person learn if not from other, smarter people?

But the NRA doesnn't care. They say no to training. Stupid people let the NRA speak for them because they're too stupid to think for themselves.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~

If I don't answer when you talk to me or about me, that's likely because I have you on ignore.  Try to PM me. It won't let you PM me if I have you on ignore. There are other people, not members, who peruse this site. I want THEM to know why I don't reply to everyone who talks to or about me.
Reply
#8
(12-08-2017, 08:45 AM)jafs3 Wrote: I would guess the problem is carrying it through states in which it's not legal?

Otherwise, if you just have it in KS, and carry it into a neighboring state where it's legal, I'm not sure there's an issue, is there?

yes, the bill would allow only legal states to participate - so no carrying from permitted state to a non-permitted state.

This country is bi-polar. Some states have legalized marijuana, but federa statutes declare marijauana illegal. Now they want federally legal concealed-carry between states that legally allow concealed carry.
Its very, very difficult to dispel ignorance if you retain arrogance.
Reply
#9
Then I'm not sure there's a real issue.

Why shouldn't somebody be able to carry their gun concealed in one state, then travel to another state where it's also legal (providing they don't travel through any states in which it's not legal)? And why would we need a federal law making that ok? It would be ok according to each state already, right?
Reply
#10
I can only think that it's about the crossing of state lines - what else is there?
Its very, very difficult to dispel ignorance if you retain arrogance.
Reply


Forum Jump:


Users browsing this thread: 1 Guest(s)

Our Amazon Picks


Donate With PayPal